Email Me

neilm@ncmlegal.com
for a consultation

very latest closeup.jpg

 Published by Mr. McCabe

• COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM IN THE DEVOLUTION ERA, Lanham, MD. (Lexington 2002) 
• STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Cases and Materials, (with Catherine Greene Burnett), Houston, TX (John Marshall 1994) 
• "Our Federalism," Not Theirs: Judicial Comparative Federalism in the U.S., 40 S. TEX. L. REV. 541 (1999) 
• Privilege vs. Truth, TEX. LAW. at 21, December 14, 1998 
• State Constitutions and Substantive Criminal Law, 71 TEMP. L. REV. 521 (1998) 
• Merchants of Chaos, Q., Fall 1997 
• A Rescue from the Jaws of the Crocodile: The Post-Certiorari Plain Statement Footnote, 59 ALB. L. REV. 1737 (1996) 
• The Crouch Case, TEX. LAW., June 24 (1996) 
• State Constitutional Law: Separation of Powers in Criminal Cases, 17 CHAMPION, Nov. 1993 
• Attack on the Court Was Misleading, Unfair, TEX. LAW, Aug. 9, 1993 
• A Compass in the Swamp: A Guide to Tactics in State Constitutional Law Challenges, (with Catherine Greene Burnett), 25 TEX. TECH L. REV. 75 (1993) 

• The State and Federal Religion Clauses: Differences of Degree and Kind, 5 ST. THOMAS L. REV. 49 (1992) 
• Legislative Facts as Evidence in State Constitutional Search Analysis, 65 TEMP. L. REV. 1229 
• Ex Post Facto Provisions of State Constitutions, (with Cynthia Ann Bell), 4 EMERGING ISSUES ST. CONST. L. 133 (1991) 
• Criminal Law Developments Under State Constitutions, 1989-1990, 3 EMERGING ISSUES ST. CONST. L. 1 (1990) 
• Sports Fans and Speech Freedom, 27 HOUS. LAW, May-June 1990 
• The Right to a Lawyer at a Lineup. Support From State Courts and Experimental Psychology, 22 IND. L. REV. 905 (1989) 
• The Right to a Lawyer at a Lineup. Support From State Courts and Experimental Psychology, 3 CRIM. PRAC. L. REV. 1 (1990) 
• From Open Fields to Open Skies: The Constitutionality of Aerial Surveillance, 16 SEARCH & SEIZURE L. REP. 153 (1989) 
• Four Faces of State Constitutional Separation of Powers: Challenges to Speedy Trial and Speedy Disposition Provisions, 62 TEMP. L.   REV. 177 (1989) 
• DAs Are Selling the Public a Bill of Goods, TEX. LAW., Feb. 20, 1989

• State Constitutions and the Open Fields Doctrine: A Historical-Definitional Analysis of the Scope of Protection Against Warrantless       Searches of Possessions, 13 VT. L. REV. 179 (1988) 
• State Maintains its Brand of Justice, TEX. LAW, July 4, 1988 
• The State Constitutions in the Bicentennial Year, 17 VOICE FOR THE DEF., Dec. 1987 
• Why Johnny Can't Sue: Separation of Powers Between District and County Attorneys in Harris County, 17 VOICE FOR THE DEF.,       Sept. 1987 
• Holmes v. Eckles Decision: A Victory for Civil Litigants, TEX. LAW., May 4, 1987 
• Sodomy Decision Ironic, TEX. LAW., Aug. 4, 1986 
• The New Doctrine of Fundamental Error: Texas Gets in Step with the Majority on Criminal Cases, (with David L. Crump), 23 HOUS.     LAW., Jan. Feb. 1986 
• Twenty-Fifth Annual Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition, (Co-Author with Richard J. Graving, Chris   DiFerrante, David W. Holman, M. Kip Morgan, Katrina D. Packard; David J. Sacks), 26 S. TEX. L.J. 243 (1985) 
• In Defense of Almanza, TEX. LAW., Sept. 25, 1985 
• Defending McMaster, TEX. LAW., Aug. 7, 1985 

CITATIONS TO NEIL MCCABE'S PUBLICATIONS IN JUDICIAL OPINIONS

  • State v. Wright, 961 N.W.2d 396, 403 (Iowa 2021).

  • State v. Brown, 930 N.W.2d 840, 861 (Iowa 2019) (McDonald, J, concurring specially)​.

  • In re Dependency of S.K.-P., 401 P.3d 442, 200 Wn.App. 86, 108 (Wash. App. 2017).

  • Martinez v. State, 503 S.W.3d 728, 734 (Tex. App. –El Paso 2016, pet. ref’d)

  • State v. Senn, 882 N.W.2d 1, 58 (Iowa 2016) (Appel, J., dissenting).

  • Medrano v. State, 421 S.W.3d 869, 878 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2014, pet. ref’d).

  • State v. Baldon, 829 N.W.2d 785, 833 (Iowa 2013).

  • City of Dallas v. Stewart, 361 S.W.3d 562, 573 (Tex. 2012).

  • People v. Galvadon, 103 P.3d 923, 936 (Colo. 2005).

  • O'Brien v. Jones, 999 P.2d 95 (Cal. 2000) (Kennard, J., dissenting).

  • State v. McMorris, 570 N.W.2d 384, 390 n. 9 (Wis. 1997).

  • Malyon v. Pierce County, 935 P.2d 1272, 1281 n. 30 (Wash. 1997).

  • Armadillo Bail Bonds v. State, 802 S.W.2d 237, 239 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990).

  • Autran v. State, 887 S.W.2d 31, 37 n. 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).

  • Johnson v. State, 912 S.W.2d 227, 237 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (Baird, J., concurring).

  • Bauder v. State, 921 S.W.2d 696, 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (Clinton, J., concurring).

  • Tilton v. Marshall, 925 S.W.2d 672, 677 n. 6 (Tex. 1996).

  • Artway v. Attorney General of New Jersey, 876 F.Supp. 666, 671 (D.N.J. 1995).

  • Ex parte Tucci, 859 S.W.2d 1, 12 n. 34 (Tex. 1993).

  • Saldana v. State, 846 P.2d 604, 661 (Wyo. 1993).

  • Muniz v. State, 865 S.W.2d 513, 517 n. 5 (Tex. App. —San Antonio 1993, pet. ref’d)

  • Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96, 99 (Tex. App. —Houston [1 Dist.] 1993, no pet.)

  • State v. Kirchoff, 587 A.2d 988, 991 (Vt. 1991) and 997 (Springer, District Judge, Ret., Specially Assigned, concurring)

CITATIONS TO NEIL MCCABE'S BOOKS, ARTICLES, AND COMMENTS IN SCHOLARLY LITERATURE

  • Paul Benjamin Linton, Neutralizing State Constitutions As a Source of Abortion Rights: The Path Forward, 34 Regent Univ. L. Rev. 385, 495 n. 121 (2021-2022).

  • Daniel Epps, Checks and Balances in the Criminal Law, 74 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2021).

  • Ido Hartogsohn, American Trip: Set, Setting, and the Psychedelic Experience in the Twentieth Century (MIT Press 2020).

  • Aliza Plener Cover, Supermajoritarian Criminal Justice, 87 Geo Wash. L. Rev. (2019).

  • Francesco Palermo, Comparative Federalism (Hart Publishing 2019).

  • Lauren Fash, Automated License Plate Readers: The Difficult Balance of Solving Crime and Protecting Individual Privacy, 78 Md. L. Rev. Online 63, 86 nn. 208 & 210 (2019) 

  • Judith Wyttenbach, Systemic and Structural Factors Relating to Quality and Equality of Human Rights Implementation in Federal States: A Critical Assessment of the Practice of Human Rights Treaty Bodies, 7 Int’l Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 43, 59 n. 82 (2018).

  • Laurent Sacharoff, Montejo and the New Judicial Federalism, 50 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 599, 614 n. 169 (2017-2018).

  • K.W. Graham, Faculty Law Review Articles, 1894-2017 153 UCLA Public Law & Legal Theory Series (2018).

  • Jessica Steinberg, Anna E. Carpenter, Colleen F. Shanahan, & Alyx Mark, Studying the “New” Civil Judges, Wis. L. J. 249, 268 n. 82 (2018).

  • Anthony Joseph, Down But Not Out: Trinity Lutheran’s Implications for State No-Aid Provisions, JCL Online 26 n. 193 (2018).

  • Roberto Niembro O, LA DISTRIBUCIÓN DE COMPETENCIAS LEGISLATIVAS TRATÁNDOSE DE DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES PREVISTOS EN LA CONSTITUCIÓN MEXICANA 1 n. 2, 23 n.47 (2017).

  • Encyclopedia of American Civil Rights and Liberties: Revised and Expanded 352 (Kara E. Stooksbury, John M. Scheb II, Otis H. Stephens Jr., ed.) (2017).

  • Warren Redlich, A Substantive Due Process Challenge to the War on Drugs 47 n. 41 (2017).

  • Maureen E. Brady, The Lost Effects of the Fourth Amendment: Giving Personal Property Due Protection, 125 Yale L. J. 946, 972 n. 115 (2015-2016).

  • Сборникнаучныхстатей, ТИПЫ ПРАВОПОНИМАНИЯ И ВЫЗОВЫ МЕНЯЮЩЕГОСЯ МИРА104 n. 222 (Санкт-Петербург 2016).

  • Liberalization Trends of Criminal Law in Georgia 144, n. 31 (Tblisi 2016).

  • Robert R. Barton, Texas Search and Seizure 7 n. 14 (2015).

  • M. Boggiani, Certezza e Diritto Penale Statunitense: Vagueness, Iretroattivita e Stare Decisis 94, nn. 3 & 4 (2015)

  • Grigol Ubiria, Soviet Nation-Building in Central Asia: The Making of the Kazakh andUzbek Nations98 n. 27 (2015).

  • Stapleton, P. and Skinner, D. ‘The Affordable Care Act and Assisted Reproductive Technology Use’, Politics and the Life Sciences 34(2)n. 15 (Cambridge University 2015).

  • James K. Leven, Attention Gun-Rights Advocates: Don't Forget the Illinois Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms, 48 J. Marshall L. Rev. 53, 88 n. 169 (2014-2015).

  • Boris I. Bittker, Scott C. Idleman, Frank S. Ravitch, Religion and the State in American Law 152 n. 15 (2015).

  • Kevin Barry, Going Retro: Abolition for All, 46 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 669, 738 n. 416 (2014-2015).

  • Colin Shaff, Is the Court Allergic to Katz -Problems Posed By New Methods of Electronic Surveillance to the Reasonable-Expectation-of-Privacy Test, 23 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 409, 439 n. 174 (2014).

  • Joshua Canzona, Contradictory Impulses in the Psychedelic Sixties, 20.1 Limina 11 n. 47 (2014).

  • Myron Moskovitz, Cases and Problems in Criminal Procedure: The Police (2014).

  • Jeffrey Omar Usman,Constitutional Constraints on Retroactive Civil Legislation: The Hollow Promises of the Federal Constitution and Unrealized Potential of State Constitutions, 14 Nev. L.J. 63, 68 n. 35 (2013).

  • James N.G. Cauthen, State Constitutions and Challenges to Nonpublic School Transportation Programs, 55 J. Church & State 498 n. 12 (2013).

  • MG Roskin, RL Cord, JA Medeiros, WS Jones, Siyaset Bilimi: Bir Giriş (2013).

  • Andrea Iff, Peace-Promoting Federalism: Making Sense of India and Nigeria, 42 Publius: The Journal of Federalism 227 (2013).

  • Gabrijela Buljan & Tanja Gradečak-Erdeljić,Where Cognitive Linguistics Meets Paremiology: A Cognitive Contrastive View of Selected English and Croatian Proverbs64,81 (Exell 2013).

  • Joshua Dressler & Alan C. Michaels, Understanding Criminal Procedure: Investigation3, n. 6 (2013).

  • Guénola Capron, Carmen Icazuriaga Montes, Silvana Levi,et al, LA GEOGRAFÍA CONTEMPORÁNEA Y ELISÉE RECLUS (2011).

  • Donald T. Hornstein, Resiliency, Adaptation, and the Upsides of Ex Post Lawmaking, 89 N.C. L. Rev. 1549, 1550 n. 2 (2011).

  • J. Kelly Strader, Lawrence’s Criminal Law, 16 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 41, 62 n. 115 (2011).

  • Carlos Hernandez Ferreiro, La Descentralización en Europa Central y Oriental: Balance y Perspectivas para una Agenda Futura 164 (2011).

  • IL FEDERALISMO E LE COSTITUZIONI FEDERALI. PARTE PRIMA: LINEE EVOLUTIVE NEL PENSIERO POLITICO E NELLA TEORIA GIURIDICA. Percorso bibliografico nelle collezioni della Biblioteca del Senato 2002 (2010-2011).

  • Donald T. Hornstein, Resiliency, Adaptation, and the Upsides of Ex Post Lawmaking, 89 N.C. L. Rev. 1549, 1550, n. 2 (2010-2011).

  • David A. Sonenshein & Robin Nilon, Eyewitness Errors and Wrongful Convictions: Let's Give Sciencea Chance, 89 Or. L. Rev. 263, 269 n. 25 (2010-2011).

  • Seth Rokosky, Denied and Disparaged: Applying the “Federalist” Ninth Amendment, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev, 275,278-79 n. 16 (2010).

  • Ann O’M. Bowman & Richard C. Kearney,Subsidiarity in State-Local Relations 16 (2010).

  • Ted Occhialino, How One Law Review Article Transformed the Law of New Mexico Forever (Not!), 40 N.M. L. Rev. 207, 209 n. 25 (2010).

  • David B. Magleby & Paul C. Light, Government by the People 71 (2009)​.

  • J. Thomas Sullivan, Developing a State Constitutional Law Strategy in New Mexico Criminal Prosecutions, 39 N.M. L. Rev. 407, 413 n. 28 (2009).

  • K.J. Lau, Vox Populi: Parody and Political Proverbs, in The Proverbial “Pied Piper”: A Festschrift Volume of Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Mieder 77-78 (Peter Lang & Kevin J. McKenna ed.) (2009).

  • Trevor Blank, Fieldwork, Memory, and the Impact of 9/11 on an Eastern Tennessee Klansman: A Folklorist’s Reflection, 35 Voices, J. N.Y. Folklore (Fall-Winter 2009).

  • Susan F. Mandiberg, Why Sentencing by a Judge Satisfies the Right to Jury Trial: A Comparative Law Look at Blakely and Booker,40 McGeorge L. Rev. 107, 137 n. 202 (2009).

  • Robert F. Williams, The Law of American State Constitutions 144 n. 46, 173 n. 197, 175 n. 206 (Oxford Univ. Press 2009).

  • Vincent de Briant, Contribution a l’etude des “arrangements federatifs” de l’Etat federal a l’Etat unitaire decentralizen. 17(2009).

  • Dannye Holly, The Supreme Courts: Did September 11th Accelerate Their Sanctioning the Constitutionality of Criminalizing Suspicion, 7 Pierce L. Rev. 39 (2008-2009).

  • J. Mitchell Pickerill &Paul Chen, Medical Marijuana Policy and the Virtues of Federalism, 38 Publius 22, 53 (2008).

  • David B. Magleby, State and Local Politics: Government by the People 89 (2009).

  • Comment, Sixth Amendment – Attachment of Right to Counsel, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 276, 312 n.71 (2008)​

  • Douglas Husak, Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law122 n. 1 (Oxford University Press 2008).

  • Note, The Erosion of Nebraska’s Free Exercise Protection: In re Interest of Anaya (Anaya II) 89 Neb. L. Rev. 159, 167 n. 63 (2008).

  • Michael E. Keasler, The Texas Experience: A Case for the Lockstep Approach, 77 Miss. L.J. 345, 345 n. 2 (2007-2008).

  • Robert F. Williams, State Constitutional Methodology in Search and Seizure Cases, 77 Miss. L.J. 225, 234 n. 42 (2007-2008).

  • Alex Kreit, Vicarious Criminal Liability and the Constitutional Dimensions of Pinkerton, 57 Am. U. L. Rev. 585, 606 n. 106 (2007-2008).

  • Christoph Kern, Justice Between Simplification and Formalism: A Discussion and Critique of the World Bank, Lex Mundi Project on Efficiency of Civil Procedure 38 n. 27 (Tubingen, Germany 2007).

  • James N. G. Cauthen, State Constitutions and Challenges to Nonpublic School TransportationPrograms, 49 J. Church & State498 (2007)

  • Supreme Court –Leading Cases, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 312 at n.71 (2007).

  • Toni Y. Hill-Kennedy, Lingering Verses: The Sharing of “Bits of Wisdom” in African-American Families in and Near West Columbia, TX (2007).

  • William G. Arnot & Karl W. Seelbach, Erroneously Compelled to Arbitration –Interlocutory and Mandamus Review Post-Palacios, 20 Appellate Advocate 5 (2007).

  • Laura Douglass, How Did We Get Here? A History of Yoga in America, 1800-1970, 17 Int’l J. Yoga Therapy 35, 40 n. 61 (2007).

  • Joshua Dressler & Alan C. Michaels, Understanding Criminal Procedure: Adjudication 3 n. 6 (4th ed. 2006).

  • Mark Noferi, Towards Attenuation: A New Due Process Limit on Pinkerton Conspiracy Liability, 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 91, 119 n. 159 (Spring 2006).

  • Robert F. Williams, State Constitutional Law: Cases and Materials (2006).

  • Encyclopedia of American Civil Rights and Liberties 364 (2006).

  • Andrew J. Liese, We Can Do Better: Anti-Homeless Ordinances as Violations of State Substantive Due Process Law, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1413, 1437 n. 146 (2006).

  • Markus Dirk Dubber, The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government 256 n. 2 (Columbia Univ. Press 2005)

  • Aanwinstenlist, Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Governance and Development (Feb. 2006).

  • Cyril Robert Emery, Treaty Solutions from the Land Down Under:Reconciling American Federalism and InternationalLaw, 24 Penn State International Law Review115, 126 n. 47(2005).

  • Daniel Pommier Vincelli, Il Federalismoin Romania: Il Dibattito Sulla Transilvanian. 7 (2005).

  • Sandra K. Dolby, Self-Help Books: Why Americans Keep Reading Them 164 (Univ. Ill. Press 2005).

  • Aaron M. Clemens, Removing the Market for Lying Snitches: Reforms to Prevent Unjust Convictions,23 QLR 151, 192-93 nn. 182 & 183 (2004-2005).

  • Matthew S. Raalf, A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: Why the Debate Surrounding Comparative Constitutional Law Is Spectacularly Ordinary, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 1239, 1252 n. 79, 1255 n. 100, 1255 n. 111, 1279 n. 242, 1282 n. 262 (2004-2005).

  • When Legal Systems Meet: Bijuralism in the Canadian Federal System, C. Lloyd Brown-John & Howard Pawley, Institut de Ciencies Politiques I Socials Adscrit a la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (2004)

  • Various Authors, Understanding Law School 175 (2004).

  • Wayne A. Logan, Democratic Despotism and Constitutional Constraint: An Empirical Analysis of Ex Post Facto Claims in State Courts, 12 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 439, 466 n. 203, 467 n. 212 (2003-2004).

  • Jeremy Patrick, The Religion Provisions of the Nebraska Constitution: An Analysis and Litigation History, 19 Journal of Law and Religion, 331,333 n. 7, 333-34 n. 10, 371-72 n. 257 (2003-2004).

  • Henry F. Fradella, A Content Analysis of Federal Judicial Views of the Social Science Researcher's Black Arts, 35 Rutgers L.J. 103, 105 n. 14 (2003-2004).

  • Markus Dirk Dubber, Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment, 55 Hastings L.J. 509, 529 n. 80 (2003-2004).

  • Dori Lynn Yob, Mistaken Identifications Cause Wrongful Convictions: New Jersey's Lineup Guidelines Restore Hope, but are They Enough, 43 Santa Clara L. Rev. 213, 227-28 n. 150 (2002-2003).

  • Kimberly S. Keller, Privacy Lost: Comparing the Attenuation of Texas's Article 1, Section 9 and the Fourth Amendment, 34 St. Mary's L.J. 429, 437 n. 32 (2002-2003).

  • Oxford Guide to American Law 529 (Kermit Hall, ed. 2002).

  • Gerald Baier, New Judicial Thinking on Sovereignty and Federalism: American and Canadian Comparisons, 23 The Justice System Journal 1, 2 n.1, 20 (2002).

  • James J. Tomkovicz, The Right to the Assistance of Counsel:A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. (Greenwood Press 2002).

  • Scott N. Cameron, Chapter 906: California’s DNA Data Bank Joins the Modern Trend of Expansion, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 219, 229 n. 103 (2001-2002).

  • Scott C. Idleman, Religious Freedom and the Interscholastic Athlete,12 Marq. Sports L. Rev. 295, 326 n. 148 (2001-2002).

  • Evan R. Seamone, Judicial Mindfulness, 70 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1023, 1084 n. 287 (2001-2002).

  • Dan Friedman, Tracing the Lineage: Textual and Conceptual Similarities in the Revolutionary-Era State Declarations of Rights of Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware, 33 Rutgers L.J. 929, 959 n. 119 (2001-2002).

  • CN Elliott, Federalism and Religious Liberty: Were Church and State Meant to Be Separate? Rutgers JL & Religion (2001).

  • Melanie Popper, Retrospective Application of State Firearm Prohibitions Triggering Enhanced Sentencing under Federal Law: A Violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause--The Circuits Split, 27 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 307, 323 n. 164 (2001).

  • Danielle Kitson, It's an Ex Post Fact: Supreme Court Misapplies the ExPost Facto Clause to Criminal Procedure Statutes, 91 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 429, 467 n. 317 (2000-2001).

  • Supreme Court –Leading Cases, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 195, 195n. 66 (2000).

  • B. Latzer, State Constitutional Criminal Law (2000).

  • Lawrence Friedman, The Constitutional Value of Dialogue and the New Judicial Federalism, 28 Hastings Const L. Q. 93, 107 n. 58 (2000).

  • Scott C. Idleman, Tort Liability, Religious Entities, and the Decline of Constitutional Protection, 75 Ind. L.J. 219, 246 n. 77 (2000).

  • T.P. Gordinier, Religious Freedom on the Chopping Block: Why the Smith Rule Is Preferable to the Sherbert Test (2000).

  • Cheryl Rubenstein, Legislating Religious Liberty Locally: The Possibility of Compelling Conflicts,19 Rev. Litig. 289, 301 n. 60, 302 nn. 66 & 67, 307 n. 96 (2000).

  • Comment, Criminal Law and Procedure, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 26, 195 n. 66 (2000).

  • So Chun, A Decade after Smith: An Examination of the New York Court of Appeals' Stance on the Free Exercise of Religion in Relation to Minnesota, Washington, and California, 63 Alb.L. Rev. 1305, 1308 n. 21, 1313 n. 69 (1999-2000).

  • Suzanne M. Monte, The Lack of Privacy in Vermont, 24 Vt. L. Rev. 199, 201 nn. 18 & 19, 202 n. 22( 1999-2000).

  • Deanell Reece Tacha, The Federal Courts in the 21st Century, 2 Chap. L. Rev. 7, 13 n.16 (1999).

  • John S. Baker Jr., State Police Powers and the Federalization of Local Crime, 72 TempleL. Rev. 673, 706 n. 178 (1999).

  • Wolfgang Mieder & Anne Tothke Litovkina, Twisted Wisdom: Modern Anti-Proverbs(1999).

  • Thomas Y. Davies, Recovering the Original Fourth Amendment, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 547, 708 n. 460 (1999).

  • Jessica l. Schneider, Breaking Stride: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' Rejection of the Lockstep Approach 1988-1998, 62 Alb. L. Rev. 1593, 1594 n. 4 (1998-1999).

  • Annual Survey of Pennsylvania Administrative Law: Survey of Selected Court Decisions, 8 Widener J. Pub. L. 601, 887 n. 34 (1998-1999).

  • Jack M. Battaglia, Religion, Sexual Orientation,and Self-Realization: First Amendment Principles and Anti-Discrimination Laws, 76 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 189, 303 n. 687 (1998-1999).

  • Vicki Zick, Reshaping the Constitution to Meet the Practical Needs of the Day: The Judicial Preference for Binding Arbitration, 82 Marq. L.Rev. 247, 249 n. 14 (1998).

  • Michael V. Hernandez, The Right of Religious Landlords to Exclude Unmarried Cohabitants: Debunking the Myth of the Tenant's New Clothes, 77 Neb. L. Rev. 494n. 259 (1998).

  • George D. Marlow, From Black Robes to White Lab Coats: The Ethical Implications of a Judge’s Sua Sponte, Ex Parte Acquisition of Social and Other Scientific Evidence during the Decision-Making Process, 72 St. John’s L. Rev. 291, 304 n. 59 (1998).

  • S.D. Winick, The Proverb Process: Intertextuality and Proverbial Innovation in Popular Culture (Univ. Penn. 1998).

  • Paul E. McGreal, Alaska Equal Protection: Constitutional Law or Common Law, 15 Alaska L. Rev. 209, 213 nn. 11 & 12 (1998).

  • Donna M. Nakagiri, Developing State Constitutional Jurisprudence after Michigan v. Long: Suggestions for Opinion Writing and Systemic Change, 1998 Det. C.L. Rev. 807, 850 n. 269 (1998).

  • John B. Wefing, State Supreme Court Justices: Who Are They, 32 New Eng. L. Rev. 47, 50 n. 5 (1997-1998).

  • Daniel A. Crane, Beyond RFRA: Free Exercise of Religion Comes of Age in the State Courts, 10 St. Thomas L. Rev. 235, 238 n. 33, 244 n. 64 (1997-1998).

  • Wayne Logan, The Ex Post Facto Clause and the Jurisprudence of Punishment, 35 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1261, 1318 n. 356 (1997-1998).

  • Felicia Harris Kyle, Constitutional Law -Peremptory Challenges -Religious-Based Peremptory Challenges in Light of J.E.B. and the Texas Constitution -Casarez v. State, 913 S.W.2d 468 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994), 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 281, 301 n. 118 (1997).

  • Robert F. Williams, In the Glare of the Supreme Court: Continuing Methodology and Legitimacy Problems in Independent State Constitutional Rights Adjudication,72 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1015, 1019 n. 22 (1997).

  • Richard E. Mitchell, An Ex Post Facto Enigma: When Does Increased Incarceration Not Equate to Increased Punishment, 49 Fla. L. Rev. 179, 181 n. 16 (1997).

  • James O. Hacking III, Won't You Be My Neighbor: Do Community Notification Statutes Violate Sexual Offenders' Rights under the Constitution's Ban on the Passage of Ex Post Facto Laws, 41 St. Louis U. L.J. 761, 776 n. 105 (1996-1997).

  • Walter Walsh, The Fearful Symmetry of Gay Rights, Religious Freedom, and Racial Equality, 40 Howard L.J. 513, 536 n. 103 (1996-1997).

  • Wolfang P. Hirczy de Mino, Does an Equal Rights Amendment Make a Difference, 60 Alb. L. Rev. 1581, 1583 n. 10 (1996-1997).

  • Daniel Gordon, Reestablishment of Religious Freedom: Developing an Alternative Model Based on State Constitutional Privacy,66 Miss. L.J. 127, 130 n. 16 (1996-1997).

  • Anand Prahlad, African-American Proverbs in Context 269 (University Press 1996).

  • Daniel Gordon, Reestablishment of Religious Freedom: Developing an Alternative Model Based on State Constitutionalism Privacy, 66 Miss. L.J. 127, 130 n. 16 (1996).

  • Scott A. Johnson, The Conflict between Religious Exercise and Efforts to Eradicate Housing Discrimination against Nontraditional Couples: Should Free Exercise Protect Landlord Bias, 53 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 351, 356 n. 25, 357 n. 28, 383 n. 184 (1996).

  • Michael V. Young, Double Jeopardy and Defendant's Request for Mistrial: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Finds Prosecutor's Intent No Longer Critical: Prosecutor Should Have Known; Bauder v. State, 921 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), 27 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1631, 1657 n. 261 (1996).

  • C. Lane Mears, Constitutional Law -Fourth Amendment -Another Slice of the Right to Privacy Pie: Do Public Schoolchildren Maintain Any Fourth Amendment Rights after Vernonia Sch. Dist. 47J v. Acton, 115 S. Ct. 2386 (1995), 37 S. Tex. L. Rev. 591, 604 n. 93 (1996).

  • William T. Stetzer, The Worst of Both Worlds: How the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Have Abandoned Juveniles in the Name of Justice, 35 Washburn L.J. 308, 317 n. 60 (1995-1996).

  • A Dictionary of American Proverbs 700 (Oxford Univ. Press 1996) (Wolfgang Mieder, Stewart A. Kingsbury, & Kelsie B. Harder eds.).

  • David Kushner, Free Exercise, Fair Housing and Marital Status--Alaskan Style, 12 Alaska L. Rev. 335, 369 n. 149 (1995).

  • Matthew S. Crider, Criminal Procedure-Searches and Seizures -Police Officers Must Meet Reasonable Officer Standard to Withstand Pretext Claim -State v. Haskell, 645 A.2d 619 (Me. 1994), 36 S. Tex. L. Rev. 629, 633 n. 22 (1995).

  • Jennifer L. Couture, Constitutional Law -An Ex Post Facto Analysis of Sex Offender Registration Statutes: Branding Criminals with a Scarlet Letter, 29 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1199, 1201 n. 18 (1995).

  • Robert F. Williams, Looking Back at the New Judicial Federalism's First Generation, 30 Val. U. L. Rev. i n. 25 (1995-1996).

  • Criminal Law –Search and Seizure –Use of a Pen Register May Be a Search within the Purview of Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution, 26 St. Mary’s L.J. 643, 658 n. 79 (1994-1995).

  • Wise Words: Essays on the Proverb 545 (Routledge 1994 Wolfgang Mieder ed.).

  • John R. Tunheim, Criminal Justice: Expanded Protections under the Minnesota Constitution, 20 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 465, 503 n. 299 (1994).

  • Jeannie B. Thomas, Out of the Frying Pan and Into the Postmodern: Folklore and Contemporary Theory, 51 Southern Folklore 107 (1994).

  • Tracey Levy, Rediscovering Rights: State Courts Reconsider the Free Exercise Clauses of Their Own Constitutions in the Wake of Employment Division v. Smith, 67 Temple L. Rev. 1017, 1032 n. 119 (1994).

  • Michael D. Schagemann, The Implicitly Constitutional Item Veto, 19 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 161, 180 n. 154 (1994).

  • James W. Paulsen, Family Law: Parent and Child, 47 S.M.U. L. Rev. 1197, 1200 n. 27 (1993-1994).

  • Julia A. Houston, Sex Offender Registration Acts: An Added Dimension to the War on Crime, 28 Ga. L. Rev. 729, 757 n. 174 (1993-1994).

  • Michael J. Desmond, Limiting a Defendant's Peremptory Challenges: Georgia v. McCollum and the Problematic Extension of EqualProtection, 42 Cath. U. L. Rev. 389, 397 n. 42 (1993).

  • Daniel B. Yeager, Search, Seizure and the Positive Law: Expectations of Privacy Outside the Fourth Amendment, 84 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 249, 293 n. 267 (Summer 1993).

  • John Devlin, Toward a State Constitutional Analysis of Allocation of Powers: Legislators and Legislative Appointees Performing Administrative Functions, 66 Temple L. Rev. 1205, 1211 n.21 (1993).

  • Mark Tushnet, The Rhetoric of Free Exercise Discourse, 1993 BYU L. Rev. 117, 119 n. 10 (1993).

  • David J. Saari, Separation of Powers, Judicial Impartiality, and Judicial Independence: Primary Goals of Court Management Education (1993).

  • Reinhold Aman, Talking Dirty: A Bawdy Compendium of Abusive Language, Outrageous Insults, & Wicked Jokes, 22-23 (1993).

  • Randall D. Johnson, The Criminally Derived Property Statute: Constitutional and Interpretive Issues Raised by 18 U.S.C. 1957, 34 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1291, 1343 n. 186 (1992-1993).

  • Jonathan Feldman, Separation of Powers and Judicial Review of Positive Rights Claims: The Role of State Courts in an Era of Positive Government, 24 Rutgers L.J. 1057, 1066 n. 49 (1992-1993).

  • Alan Copelin, A Time to Act: Statutory Exceptions to State-Created Exclusionary Rules, 20 Am. J. Crim. L. 339, 354 n. 95 (1992-1993).

  • Paul R. Stone & Henry De La Garza, Criminal Trespass and the Exclusionary Rule in Texas, 24 St. Mary's L.J. 443, 448 n. 20, 451 n. 33, 453 n. 43(1992-1993).

  • Marshall J. Tinkle, Forward into the Past: State Constitutions and Retroactive Laws, 65 Temple L. Rev. 1253, 1253 n. 2 (1992).

  • Naikang Tsao, Ameliorating Environmental Racism: A Citizens' Guide to Combatting the Discriminatory Siting of Toxic Waste Dumps, 67 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 366, 397 n. 189 (May 1992).

  • Robert F. Williams, State Constitutional Law: Teaching and Scholarship, 41 J. Legal Educ. 243, 247 n. 23 (1991).

  • Jean-Paul Layrisson, The Exclusion of Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence and Why the Louisiana Supreme Court Should Reject United States v. Leon on Independent State Grounds, 51 La. L. Rev. 861, 870 n. 54 (1990-1991).

  • George E. Dix, Independence in Texas Constitutional Self-Incrimination and Search Law, 31 S. Tex. L. Rev. 577, 616 n. 221 (1990).

  • James P. Leary, "The Land Won't Burn": An Esoteric American Proverb and Its Significance, In Folk Groups and Folklore Genres Readers: A Reader (Utah State Univ. Press 1989).

  • Nina Morrison, Curing “Constitutional Amnesia”: Criminal Procedure under State Constitutions, 880 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 883, n. 24 (1988).

  • Elliot Oring, Folk Groups and Folklore Genres: An Introduction (Utah State Univ. Press. 1986)

  • Signe Howell, Formal Speech Acts as One Discourse, Man, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Mar., 1986) (Published by: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland).

  • F.A. de Caro, Riddles and Proverbs, in Folk Groups and Folklore Genres: An Introduction (Utah State Univ. Press 1986)

  • W. Mieder, Deutsche Sprichwörter in Literatur, Politik, Presse und Werbung(1983).

  • Sternberger & Storz, Sprichworter untem Hakenkreuz (1983).

  • C. Lindahl, J.S. Rikoon, E.J. Lawless, A Basic Guide to Fieldwork for Beginning Folklore Students: Techniques of Selection, Collection, Analysis , and Presentation (1979).

  • Lutz Röhrich & Wolfgang Mieder, Sprichwort (1977).

  • D. Boesky, Proverbs and Psychoanalysis (1976).

  • Wolfgang Mieder, Review of Lexikon der sprichwörtlichen Redensarten by Lutz Röhrich, 88 J. Amer. Folklore, 420, 421 n. 5 (1975).

  • Joseph G. Jorgensen and Marcello Truzzi (ed.), Anthropology and American Life, 251 - 258 (Prentice-Hall 1974).

  • American Proverb Literature: A Bibliography, F.A. De Caro & W.A. McNeil, Folklore Forum, Dec. 1970, page 25.